Sky reaches its limit with data caps

Subscribe To RSSRSS

Anyone who has ever asked what business benefits ultra-fast broadband can deliver should pose this question to Sky TV.

In fact, ask any broadcaster.

In a time when illegal downloading of music, movies and TV shows is rife, broadcasters have had to adapt by themselves offering free or low-cost download services to their audiences.

And while this may cannibalise audiences for their broadcast services to some degree, it also reaches those people they will just not pin down in front of a TV screen or in earshot of a radio.

Online media services also opens up new revenue streams for broadcasters as they offer another avenue for advertisers to reach audiences they would not otherwise get in front of.

So, the business model for offering online TV sounds pretty solid, right?

Wrong. Again, ask Sky TV.

It’s Sky Online download service is under threat – not because it can’t make the business case fly, but because customers want too much of it and in the process are burning up the measly data caps meted out by local ISPs.

OK, that may be a bit harsh on the ISPs – well most of them anyway.

For instance, Orcon has recently created its O Zone – a group of local websites from which traffic is zero-rated – in other words, it does not count towards a customer’s data cap – this includes TVNZ Ondemand.

But as the New Zealand Herald’s John Drinnan reports, even though Sky has been trying to secure a similar deal with ISPs, it plans to now halt the Sky Online service, as it does not make sense in the current New Zealand broadband market.

Drinnan writes that with the wholesale price charged for bandwidth capacity there are no signs yet that any ISP could cover the costs of customers' rapidly expanding downloads of video.

This reflects the fact that ISPs themselves are hamstrung by bandwidth restrictions placed on them.

The additional bandwidth capacity that fibre offers will go a long way to relieving these limitations. After all – copper was never built to transmit video, and will surely buckle under what will inevitably become an insatiable demand for more and higher quality content.

With fibre to the premise, data caps on local traffic, such as Sky Online and TVNZ Ondemand, should disappear.

International bandwidth meanwhile is another thorny and a highly emotive issue for ISPs, as displayed at last week’s Telecommunications and ICT Summit, where several speakers referred to this as one of the major bottlenecks in unleashing New Zealand’s connectivity.

But, if media content providers can host and distribute overseas material locally, which their licences with large studios that produce the material would certainly favour, international bandwidth cannot be used as an excuse for restrictive data caps.

As Sky's dilemma shows, these restrictions both limit uptake of new online services and inhibits local businesses from offering such services, which is a loss to the overall economy.

This demonstrates clearly that a 21st Century communications infrastructure is needed now if New Zealand wants to create and nurture a digital economy.

Categories: Fixed line carriers | Innovation | ISPs | TUANZ policy

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

     

2 comments

  • Neil says:

    So Many issues

    1) "With fibre to the premise, data caps on local traffic, such as Sky Online and TVNZ Ondemand, should disappear."

    FTTP or FTTH does not necessarily mean that Local/National Backhaul will be solved.

    I will be happy with Sky over my ADSL2+ as long as the backhaul can handle it. My You Tube still buffers even though I am getting 8Mbps from the exchange right now. . . . What would High Def Sky TV do???

    2) "After all – copper was never built to transmit video, and will surely buckle under what will inevitably become an insatiable demand for more and higher quality content."

    Copper was never built to transmit Video. Video these days are just bitstreams. Are you saying that Copper will not transmit Bits. Let me introduce you to:
    i) ADSL2+ will run quite happily at 15+ Mbps. ie 2 x High Def TV channels.
    ii) VDSL2 at a higher data rate.

    3) "But, if media content providers can host and distribute overseas material locally, which their licences with large studios that produce the material would certainly favour, international bandwidth cannot be used as an excuse for restrictive data caps."

    Good for Sky. They charge for this service. $5 on top of their Sky rental. What about the ISP's. Sky, just like every other Geek, wants the ISP to provide the unlimited bandwidth for free. Yeeeeese. . . . If Sky wants to stream video to the ISP's customers while charging their own, let them pay the ISP to expand their Local and National data links.


    I guess what I am intrigued about is the ongoing caracterisation by TUANZ of the Telecommunications market in NZ as only being about Fibre to the Home.

    There are many other reasons for what is happening here and not all tied to the limited bandwidth from Exchange (or cabinette) to the home provided by copper.

    My issue is that the data allowance on Backhaul is still very limited.
    a) 1Mbps per 100 users Nationally. That equates to 10Kbps per user.
    b) 1Mbps per 150 users Internationally. ie 6.6Kbps. No amount of FTTH is going to unblock those bottlenecks.

    I think that the best thing this government could do with $500 million of OUR $1.5 Billion is to build another international link (Kordia) and drive fibre to the cabinette then give the capacity very cheaply or at cost to the players. (we pay for motorways out of taxes, why can't we pay for digital highways)

    People will get the unlimited data they require at a decent speed over ADSL2+ of VDSL. THEN the demand for higher speed Local connections will warrant the drive to FTTH.

    Just a thought. Go for "Demand Pull" (I already have a need for speed in the national and international links) rather than "Capabilities Push" (FTTH will give me nothing as yet).

    Drop the $500 million into National and International bandwidth I say and the rest will sort itself out. (probably without any further $'s from the tax payer)

    Added: 30 June 2009, 5:36 p.m.
  • Rod Drury says:

    Right on Neil.

    When will the debate come back to the international links? FTTH is a desirable but expensive goal. Focusing on International is the game changer that can really improve NZ and will drive last mile investment.

    Simple maths. Say 1B of capex to solve international. Cable to GUAM, Hawaii or San Diego - or buy Southern Cross. The debt market would love an 8% govt backed bond. So 1B of capex might cost $80m of interest per annum. That doesn't seem like much revenue to recover on a cost plus basis.

    So solving international could cost the Govt almost nothing, give retired savers some nice income and transform NZ.

    What are we waiting for?

    Rod

    Added: 2 July 2009, 10:42 a.m.
Display Name
Email Address
 
Your Comments
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below, this test is used to prevent automated robots from posting comments.
 
CAPTCHA code image
Speak the codeChange the code
 
 
  >> Submit Comments