TUANZ - Telecommunications Users Association of New Zealand   Search website    
 
Benefit of the Doubt Goes to Telecom Wholesale
Posted Sun 25 November 2007 @ 11:59 a.m. by Ernie

My posting last week "Telecom Wholesale Has a Case to Answer" created a bit of a storm. I've had strong representations from both sides and phone calls from highly unusual sources, lobbying me about the position TUANZ should take. At last count I can remember at least 18 conversations ranging from TCF Board members, hands-on regulatory people, industry observers, and CEOs. And there’s been a reaction from readers in the Blog comments - even one who had second thoughts and asked for their comment to be withdrawn!

Telecom Wholesale addressed the issue with its customers on Thursday. TUANZ wasn’t there as our invitation came a bit late, but I've chatted to a few people who were.

So after a few days' hindsight can I answer my opening question - the bit that I know upset Telecom - "Has the new friendly Telecom of the last eighteen months been a facade? Has the ugly, anti-competitive; scheming version returned? Did it ever go away?"

Let’s put a few things in perspective:

* It’s been a huge year for the many people at the regulatory and implementation interface. People right across the industry have worked immensely hard. Many are exhausted, and sometimes in those circumstances emotions run a bit high.
*Telecom Wholesale could have served its customers better by keeping the impact of cabinetising more on the radar. The announcement about cabinetisation clearly came as a major shock to several of Telecom's wholesale customers.
*Whether they should have been so shocked is a moot point. Telecom counter-argues, with some legitimacy, that it had signalled the cabinetising plans way back. As Matt Crockett said to me in an email "I believe some of the industry are genuinely surprised (and hence are not insincere) – my point is given the information provided over the last 6-12 months, especially that in June, I don’t think they should be."
*The change of CEO at Telecom has not helped this situation. Capital expenditure decisions went on hold for some time, and now there's a rush to get back into action.

So my feeling a few days later is that we can still trust Telecom's sincerity. I think it could have handled the communication better and I'm really concerned about the impact on its competitors' LLU investment plans. I hope it will take a "friendly wholesaler" view in looking for compromises. But we're all learning in this new environment and will get a few things wrong - the trick is to learn from them.

So for now I'm giving the Wholesale team the benefit of the doubt. Lessons to learn - yes. Better communication needed - yes. Fix-up job ahead - yes. Fundamental reason for customers to reduce trust - probably not.

And a final word to CEOs right across the industry. This is one of several illustrations I've seen that people closely engaged in the regulatory scene are very, very battle weary. Please make sure the key ones, on all sides of the process, get a good break this summer. It really has been gruelling for many people and they need and deserve this.


 

 
Categories: Fixed line carriers | Innovation | ISPs | Regulatory | TUANZ policy | Vendors | Wireless carriers
     
Comments (2)

2 Comments

Mark says:
> Ernie said: > *Whether they should have been so shocked is a moot point. I agree. I think the important realisation to come out of the cabinetisation plans is that we are still a long way from a world of equivalence. To put the current cabinetisation plan into an Operational Separation framework: • Telecom Wholesale is the only Access Seeker that ANS has given access to Sub-loop unbundling and its likely to remain that way for at least the next 12 months (until subloop unbundling Determination) • Telecom Wholesale is the only Access Seeker for the foreseeable future that ANS will give access to FTTH trials, the natural evolution of the FTTN (sub-loop) architecture. • Telecom Wholesale is the only Access Seeker that ANS has starting offering a “Voice-only” UCLL variant for MPFs that pass POTS through a dual fed cabinet. It would appear that other Access Seekers in competition to Telecom Wholesale will be playing catch-up for quite some time while Telecom Wholesale enjoys its “early mover advantage”.
Added: 3 December 2007, 9:56 a.m.

Khool Chick says:
Whether or not we can "TRUST" Telecom's sincerity ... hmmm! Certainly, I have no issue with it being given the benefit of the doubt. However, I wonder if there is a lot left over from the days when Telecom's behaviour left a lot to be desired? Monsieur Reynolds and his team are making the right noises (not to mention, making the right poses for cute pics for the media) and saying the right things, but is he just a smiling assasin? We don't know. Public perception is one thing, business connivance is something else. There is always going to be an element of protecting one's own business, which is understandable. I certainly hope that Telecom's 'friendly' and 'trustworthy' public face mirrors its 'private' face. After seeing some of Telecom's draft undertakings re operational separation, I sincerely question that. Frankly, I am rather surprised that given the last CEO's public admission of confusing advertisements, the Commerce Commission did not prosecute Madame Gattung (and those relevant officers) personally for misleading and deceptive conduct under the Fair Trading Act.
Added: 3 December 2007, 2:42 p.m.

Add Your Comments



Display Name
Email Address
 
Your Comments

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below, this test is used to prevent automated robots from posting comments.
CAPTCHA code image
Speak the codeChange the code