Networks versus MVNOs
RSS
Posted Thu 30 October 2008 @ 9:20 a.m. by Ernie Newman
So Black and White Mobile has launched! TUANZ foreshadowed this on this Blog several weeks ago.
Its targeting the prepay market. It won't be appealing much to TUANZ members who are mainly "on account" large users, but no doubt it will find a welcome market especially among younger users. It deserves to succeed.
Its got a complex tie-in with Aussie-listed telco M2.
So lets not take anything away from Black and White. But I do have a concern about the misleading impact publicity about launches like this may have on public opinion.
When TelstraClear re-entered mobile several weeks ago with effectively a MVNO, some media hailed it as a "third mobile network." Obviously its not. Neither is Black and White. They are Mobile Virtual Network Operators - a sophisticated form of re-packaging of existing mobile services. But at the end of the day they exist by favour of, and on terms negotiated with, one of the two existing mobile operators. They're re-sellers - with greater marketing freedom than some, but re-sellers nonetheless.
New Zealand will only get real competition to drive down prices and improve services when we have a third real network - probably NZ Communications, but maybe some other investor from left field.
In the meantime lets keep our feet firmly on the ground. Competition MVNO-style is welcome, but it won't change the world for the bulk of the market. That's especially true of the big users, who increasingly feel unloved in the mobile space.
Categories: Innovation | TUANZ policy | Wireless carriers