Ultra fast broadband critical for growth: Joyce

Subscribe To RSSRSS

Ultra fast broadband is not be a luxury, but will be critically important to New Zealand's growth prospects, ICT minister Steven Joyce said at the Commerce Commission’s Broadband at a Crossroads conference yesterday.

During a speech in which he reiterated the Government’s commitment to investing $1.5 billion in a fibre roll out, Minister Joyce said ultra-fast broadband will provide New Zealanders with the base infrastructure that will support advanced broadband services, including high-speed, real-time internet connections to the world.

“We are convinced that access to ultra fast broadband will give rise to new enterprise and innovation and spur increased productivity.”

The Government plans to provide 75 percent of New Zealanders access to a fibre-based next generation broadband network within a decade.

For Minister Joyce, ultra fast broadband means network access capability of at least 100 Mbps without contention and in both directions. In general, only fibre will be able to provide this capability, he says.

“Fibre will deliver huge economic benefits for our country in terms of enhanced productivity, improved global connectivity, and enhanced capacity for innovation.”

Minister Joyce cited independent experts who estimate these benefits will be worth between $2.4 billion and $4.4 billion a year.

The Minister said ultra fast broadband is critical for New Zealand as it overcomes the tyranny of distance the country faces.

“Our geographic isolation and the distance between us and our competitors has become even more significant as people think twice about the costs of travel and begin to think about carbon footprints,” he said.

“Ultra fast broadband would put our businesses in meeting rooms around the globe.”

Fibre to schools meanwhile will greatly enhance teaching and learning and will ensure children have access to the same information at the same time as their peers around the world, the Minister added. 

Ultra fast broadband will also boost productivity in hospitals and aid medical research, while fibre to the home will create opportunities for home businesses and for people to telecommute, he said.

Huge productivity advances will come from SMEs being able to have large company IT support through software as a service offerings.

Ultra fast broadband at speeds of 100 Mbps or more will ensure New Zealand has the competitive edge it needs to prosper, said Minister Joyce.

“The New Zealand Government believes there is a significant gap between what the market here is currently providing and what we will need it to provide if we are to remain relevant and competitive into the future. Our policy is about bridging that gap.”

Although the copper network has served the country well to date, Minister Joyce said it is now “a Morris minor compared with the Ferrari fibre we need to compete”.

However, if left to the market, the replacement of the bulk of the copper access network with fibre could possibly take more than thirty years, Minister Joyce said.

“As a country, we can't afford to wait that long. The government believes that we need to use ultra fast broadband as a way of getting a competitive advantage over the rest of the world.”

This was a sentiment reflected by various speakers at the conference including TUANZ chief executive Ernie Newman who said the more removed a community such as New Zealand is to the rest of the world, the more it stands to gain from access to next-generation connectivity.

Categories: Education | Events | Fixed line carriers | Innovation | ISPs | Regulatory | TUANZ policy | Vendors

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

     

4 comments

  • Neil says:

    Here we go again.

    Exactly no detail about what I need and what will be provided to me in my house. (not the carrier but the services)

    A government minister solutioning (chanting WE NEED FIBRE) rather than defining the requirements of the Residential market (the business market will pay and receive fibre based services) and then letting the experts work out the best way of providing it.

    If he worked for me in any aspect of service definition, I would sack him for incompetance. His role should be to articulate what Residential/Home services the government would like supplied and then let the experts work out how to provide them. Over Copper (VDSL), Wifi or satelite (rural) or fibre if required.

    Let the requirements dictate the solution rather than, I WANT FIBRE. . . I won't tell you why but I WANT FIBRE. . . .

    This man is going to rip $1.5 Billion out of taxpayers pockets and still will not say why.

    I have asked him via email and his reply was waffley (Ernie does not reply at all so I guess he doesn't know what will be provided) and unworthy of a 12 year school child let alone a minister of the crown.

    I know that my blogs are repetitive but it is because no one has answered my question. "What will I get at home that cannot be supplied via VDSL and requires a $5 Billion investment in fibre?"

    Regards

    Neil

    Added: 27 February 2009, 3:16 p.m. Flag as Spam  |  Flag as Offensive
  • Ian says:

    “Fibre will deliver huge economic benefits for our country in terms of enhanced productivity, improved global connectivity, and enhanced capacity for innovation.”

    How will ultra fast broadband make us more productive? I'd love to see even *one* of these studies that show how ultra-fast internet access will make us world leaders... How many businesses still travel to meet customers and staff rather than relying on telepresence and video conferencing? Heaps. Perhaps Weta Studios will be able to upload clips of their latest films to the execs in Hollywood a little faster, but other than faster peer-to-peer file sharing, how is ultra-fast broadband going to make NZ into the Promised Land? What actual applications and tools are forecast? What new solutions? What improvements to workflows that are currently throttled (if at all) by "slow broadband"? I'm all for progress, but personal helicopters, hover cars, and rocket packs haven't made their grand dawn in this 21st century - and why will ultra-fast broadband be any cooler? Someone enlighten me please... :-) (meant in honest inquiry despite the irony)...

    Added: 28 February 2009, 5:39 p.m. Flag as Spam  |  Flag as Offensive
  • Neil says:

    Me again. I have observed the following text above and it intrigues me:

    “We are convinced that access to ultra fast broadband will give rise to new enterprise and innovation and spur increased productivity.”

    “Fibre will deliver huge economic benefits for our country in terms of enhanced productivity, improved global connectivity, and enhanced capacity for innovation.”

    “Our geographic isolation and the distance between us and our competitors has become even more significant as people think twice about the costs of travel and begin to think about carbon footprints,”

    “Ultra fast broadband would put our businesses in meeting rooms around the globe.”


    Ultra fast broadband will also boost productivity in hospitals and aid medical research, while fibre to the home will create opportunities for home businesses and for people to telecommute, he said.

    “The New Zealand Government believes there is a significant gap between what the market here is currently providing and what we will need it to provide if we are to remain relevant and competitive into the future. Our policy is about bridging that gap.”


    “As a country, we can't afford to wait that long. The government believes that we need to use ultra fast broadband as a way of getting a competitive advantage over the rest of the world.”

    So:
    - Innovation
    - Increased productivity
    - Meeting rooms around the globe
    - Competitive advantage
    - Etc

    So. FTTH.

    FTT HOME!!!! Not Work or Business.

    FTT HOME is what is going to cost the money.

    Businesses, schools, hospitals, businesses all require fast Internet but they are not located down every street in New Zealand.

    HOMES do not require the same symetrical speeds as businesses.

    This whole FTTH discussion is just a way of selling the BUSINESS requirements to HOME customers to allow a few home businesses who require faster speeds to get it. And to get the people of New Zealand to pay for them.

    I still wait to hear what I want to use at HOME that requires symetrical 100Mbps connectivity to my home rather than ADSL2+ or VDSL.

    If Ernie or Steve Joyce just articulate that for me, I will shut my mouth and crawl away a wiser man. I will probably thank them for the openness and honesty.

    Until then, I will keep on asking for them, or anyone else who can tell me, to drop their generalities and tell me the truth.

    Added: 3 March 2009, 2:48 p.m. Flag as Spam  |  Flag as Offensive
  • Ian says:

    Good work Neil. Keep it up. These questions *need* to be asked so money is spent wisely. Or at least so multiple options are considered. Who knows? Perhaps a spirit of open inquiry and discussion will generate brainstorms that produce all kinds of new NZ innovations. Look at the cool GoogleEarth stuff that has come out of Christchuch for example - the home of 3D buildings. GoogleEarth requires pretty spanking bandwidth (although certainly not 100MBs) - and imagine what cool things could be delivered with high speed high res satellite imagery and streetview stuff combined. A Real Estate agent's dream? Tracking your kids on their way to school? Sure, privacy stuff to be figured out but hey - let's discuss and start innovating rather than just spending heaps of cash on glass in the ground (which by the way needs maintenance/replacement for things like delamination, retraction, cuts and breaks etc etc).

    Added: 6 March 2009, 8:25 p.m. Flag as Spam  |  Flag as Offensive
  • Comments are now closed